Nunes: Schiff ‘gave no indication’ he met with whistleblower


TO SHAPE THE COMPLAINT ITSELF. I WOULD BE BELIEVE THAT? DEVIN NUNES IS RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF ALL THIS, THE RANKING REPUBLICAN ON THE INTEL COMMITTEE AND HE JOINS US TONIGHT. THE FORMER CHAIRMAN. THANK YOU FOR COMING ON. DO YOU BELIEVE THIS EXPLANATION?>>NO. THIS EXPLANATION? NO.>>Tucker: AND LOOKS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE ON THE PEOPLE FROM THE OUTSIDE LIKE ADAM SCHIFF’S OFFICE GUIDED THIS COMPLAINT LIK OFFICE GUIDED THIS COMPLAINT LIE IT WAS A SET UP.>>IT LOOKED LIKE HE KNEW SOMETHING BEFORE HAND BECAUSE THIS WAS IN THE PRESS AND THEN UI AND STORIES WRITTEN BY GBS REPORTERS AND THEN YOU FAST-FORWARD AND HE HAD A COUPLE OF TIMES THAT HE COULD HAVE TOLD US IN PRIVATE THAT THIS HAD HAPPENED. NOTHING BUY A LOT MAKES HIM — HE DIDN’T HAVE TO TELL US, BUT HE CLEARLY GAVE NO INDICATION THAT HE HAD EVER MET WITH THE WHISTLE-BLOWER OR ANYBODY ON HIS TEAM HAD EVER MET WITH THE WHISTLE-BLOWER. THAT’S THE REAL ISSUE HERE. TWO OPPORTUNITIES — TWO OPPORTUNITIES BEHIND CLOSED DOORS AND HE DIDN’T TELL US.>>Tucker: THIS IS NOT ONE AMONG MANY STORIES. THIS IS THE BASIS FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF THE PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES. IT’S NOT A SMALL THING, IT’S THE OPPOSITE OF THAT. HOW CAN ANY OF US HAVE CONFIDENCE THAT THIS ISN’T A PURE PARTISAN INVENTION?>>IT IS AND IT’S NOT A REAL IMPEACHMENT THE WAY THAT IMPEACHMENT PROCESSES WORK, THE OTHER TIME IT HAS BEEN USED. I CAME FROM THE CAPITAL AND WE HAD NINE HOURS OF AMBASSADOR, IF YOU LISTEN TO THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, THIS WAS GOING TO BE THE GUY THAT WAS GOING TO GIVE UP ALL THE GOODS ON RUDY GIULIANI BECAUSE THIS WAS THE SPECIAL ENVOY TO UKRAINE ON BEHALF OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. OF COURSE THEY WENT ON AND ON AND ON. WHY DID THEY KEEP GOING ON AND ON? THEY WEREN’T GETTING WHAT THEY WANTED TO. I CAME IN THERE AT THE END AND I FELT HORRIBLE FOR THE MAN. HE HAS BEEN A PUBLIC SERVANT AND IS GETTING MARRIED IN A FEW WEEKS AND HE WANTS THIS TO BE DONE WITH SPIRIT HE WOULD KNOW THAT BY NUMBER ONE, BEFORE HIS TESTIMONY AND WHAT HAS LEAKED OT TESTIMONY AND WHAT HAS LEAKED OE TESTIMONY AND WHAT HAS LEAKED OR TESTIMONY AND WHAT HAS LEAKED OS TESTIMONY AND WHAT HAS LEAKED ON TESTIMONY AND WHAT HAS LEAKED OE TESTIMONY AND WHAT HAS LEAKED OT TESTIMONY AND WHAT HAS LEAKED OE TESTIMONY AND WHAT HAS LEAKED O.>>Tucker: I HAVE TO ASK YOU, YOU WERE IN CHARGE OF THE OVERSIGHT OF THE CAA AND OTHER INTEL AGENCIES AS THE HOUSE OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, DO YOU FEEL THAT OUR INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES ARE PROPERLY OVERSEEN BY THE CONGRESS? DOES THE CONGRESS — DOESN’T DEMOCRACY HAVE CONTROL?>>I THINK YOU COULD ARGUE OVER THE FBI’S COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AREA THAT STARTED THIS INVESTIGATION INTO THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, NO. A ZERO. THE FBI HAS NOT COOPERATED THROUGHOUT THIS INVESTIGATION. PERHAPS WITH WHAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS DOING RUNNING THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE BEGINNINGS OF THE RUSSIAN PROBE, YES. WITH THE CIA, I THINK THE CHALLENGES HAVE BEEN — WILL REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN PUSHING, YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER THESE AGENTS PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE. THE PEOPLE THAT ARE OUT IN THE FIELD. THE CHALLENGE YOU HAVE IS THAT THEY ARE WAY TOO MANY INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS AND CONSULTANTS AND FORMER AGENTS NOW PONTIFICATING ON NETWORKS THAT LIVE HERE IN THE SWAMP. LOOK, THERE IS A REASON TO HAVE A SMALL COUNTRY OF FOLKS HERE, AND I CAN’T GIVE THE NUMBER, BUT I CAN TELL YOU THAT THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE HERE IN THE SWAMP WHICH IS NOT WHERE THEY SHOULD BE.>>Tucker: OF COURSE NOT. THE MAJORITY? REALLY?>>I THINK IT WOULD BE THE MAJORITY. WHEN YOU TAKE THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CIA, DNI.>>Tucker: THEY ARE HANGING AROUND THE CAPITAL CITY.>>LOBBYING FOR MORE MONEY FOR THEIR PROGRAMS. I TELL YOU, ONE THING THA PEOPLE FORGET, I WAS THE WALL AND IRONICALLY IN THE SPRING OF 16 WHEN THEY’RE OPENING THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN FOR COLLUDING WITH RUSSIANS, I WENT OUT AND SAID THE BIGGEST INTELLIGENCE WAS OUR ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND VLADIMIR PUTIN’S PLANS AND INTENTIONS. IN THE SPRING OF 2016 AND OF COURSE YOU KNOW WHAT THEY DID TO ME, THE PRESS CORPS IN THIS TOWN AND THE DEMOCRATS.>>Tucker: I WAS A SECE>>Tucker: I WAS A SECT>>Tucker: I WAS A SECR>>Tucker: I WAS A SECS>>Tucker: I WAS A SECI>>Tucker: I WAS A SECN>>Tucker: I WAS A SECS>>Tucker: I WAS A SECY>>Tucker: I WAS A SECA>>Tucker: I WAS A SECL

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *